β Premier League 2009-10 Β· Sat, Mar 20, 03:00 PM UTC Β· ref: P Dowd
The betting picturemarket vs our model, market by market
βMarketβ = what bookmaker prices imply after removing their margin β the world's best guess. βModelβ = what our machine-learning model said BEFORE this game, replayed honestly (it never saw the result). A bet is only interesting when the model sees something meaningfully more likely than the market does (the edge) β it's never about picking the winner.
Who wins? (90 minutes)
| Outcome | Market says | Model says | Best price | Verdict |
|---|
| Portsmouth win | 44% | 50% | 2.20 | value: +9% |
| Draw | 29% | 32% | 3.30 | value: +4% |
| Hull win | 27% | 19% | 3.50 | fair |
across 2 bookmakers Β· probabilities de-vigged (bookmaker margin removed)
The match in numberswhat happened + what each side looked like walking in
Match stats
| 1 | Half-time score | 1 |
| 18 | Shots | 9 |
| 10 | On target | 5 |
| 11 | Corners | 1 |
| 7 | Fouls | 8 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
Pre-match form
What each side looked like walking in β computed only from games before this one.